Archive for category Soap Box

Cristobal Huet Joining Swiss League

The Chicago Blackhawks are on top of the world right now with their Stanley Cup win last season. However, during that run for the Cup, GM Stan Bowman has dug his team in a deep hole of cap space issues.

In an effort to fix his sloppy mess, Bowman has shuffled more players than you can shake a stick at. At the top of the questionable move list is the team’s decision to walk away from Stanley Cup winning goaltender Antti Niemi. After an arbitration ruling of $2.75 million in favor of Niemi, the Blackhawks signed Turco for $1.3 million instead.

From a cap space viewpoint it does make sense… kinda, but from a longevity of the team, it is pure ridiculous. Niemi, age 26, has played only 1 full year in the NHL has won a Cup. Turco, age 34, is on the way out of the league and is still in hunt for his first Stanley Cup ring.

Bowman has now opted to loan out backup goaltender Cristobal Huet to a one-year deal with HC Fribourg-Gotteron of the Swiss National League A. Huet is paid on average of $5.625 million a season of his remaining 2 years.

Perhaps the move by Bowman is to fix the mess he has created, hopefully signing Niemi to split time with Turco. After a year when Turco’s contract is up, the team then will bring Huet back to play alongside Niemi. But then again, with just shy of 48 million already hitting the cap for the 2011-2012 season, Bowman still needs to decide what to do with 6 unrestricted free agents and 5 restricted free agents, some of which are Tomas Kopecky and Brent Seabrook.

Good luck Stan, I don’t think daddy can pull you out of this mess. It looks like Chicago is on the downfall yet again, maybe this time they will still leave them on the TV for local fans to watch.

Turco looks for fresh start in Chicago

The Chicago Blackhawks made a bold move on Monday when they announced that they intended to walk away from goaltender Antti Niemi’s arbitration award of $2.75 million for next season and instead decided to sign unrestricted free agent netminder Marty Turco to a one-year, $1.3 million contract.

While the decision to sign Turco may come as a surprise, especially since the deal went down so soon after Chicago decided not to honor Niemi’s arbitration award, it will likely turn out to be the best possible scenario for the Blackhawks in the long run and help the team stay in decent shape for another shot at the Stanley Cup next season.

Turco is a seasoned professional who still has something to prove as he rounds the corner into the twilight of his career. The former Dallas Star spent nine years with the Star’s organization where he recorded several franchise records, including most wins, most shutouts and most games played. In fact, Turco was a work-horse for the Stars. He played in 60 or more games in four of his last five seasons as the starting goaltender for Dallas.

However, Turco’s numbers began to falter over the past two seasons and he struggled to regain his former All-Star form. Ultimately, the Stars decided to bring in former Atlanta Thrashers goalie Kari Lehtonen at the trade deadline this past season which all but signaled the end of Turco’s tenure in Dallas.The team opted not to offer Turco a contract extension when the free agent period began on July 1.

At the age of 34, Turco needed a change of scenery and a fresh start, and Chicago offered him just that. Turco also needs to prove that these last few seasons have been a fluke and that he is still one of the premier goaltenders in the NHL. For as much talent as the Blackhawks lost this offseason, the team still boasts a core of very talented young players who helped catapult them to success. Turco should thrive in net with players like Duncan Keith, Brian Campbell and Brent Seabrook playing defense in front of him. Young guns like Jonathan Toews and Patrick Kane should help rejuvenate Turco with their youthful enthusiasm and hard work ethic.

The team hitting the ice to help raise the championship banner in October may not even closely resemble the one that captured the cup in June, but the team is still a definite threat and should not be underestimated. Much of their core is still in tact and that could prove to be overwhelming for many teams on many nights. By bringing Turco into the mix, the Blackhawks not only save some much-needed cap space, but the team also gets a proven netminder in need of a change of scenery that could benefit from what Chicago has to offer in terms of talent, energy and dedication. Keep an eye on Turco this season. He still has a desire to play a top-level game and, more importantly, to prove his critics wrong. Chicago will offer him the opportunity, but he needs to seize the reins and show the NHL that he hasn’t yet lost his stride.

Campbell a huge factor in Hawks cap crisis

Brian Campbell may be the smartest man in hockey.

It wasn’t too long ago that Campbell himself was a highly coveted free agent whose skills as a puck-moving defenseman were in demand by several organizations around the league. After spending most of his career early on with the Buffalo Sabres, indications were that Campbell had interest in testing the open market in July 2008 when he was scheduled to become a free agent. Opting not to take a chance on losing Campbell for nothing, the Sabres decided to trade him to the San Jose Sharks for the remainder of the 2007-08 season. San Jose became the favorite to resign Campbell after they were bounced from the playoffs by the Dallas Stars, but Campbell instead opted to sign a deal with the rebuilding Chicago Blackhawks for just over $7 million a season.

While Campbell helped the Blackhawks win the Stanley Cup in only his second season with the club, his giant salary and cap hit are coming back to haunt the team in a big way. And there’s not a lot that Chicago can do about it. Why? Because Campbell made sure that there was a no-trade clause thrown into the contract with that hefty salary.

It’s a well-known fact that Chicago is currently in dire straights with their salary cap situation. The team needs at least one more forward and one more defenseman to adequately  round out their roster, but the team is already over the salary cap by about $400,000. And before the Blackhawks can look into signing two more players, they need to take care of another very urgent, pressing matter – goaltender Antti Niemi.

Niemi, who only made $800,000 last season, overtook the starting goaltender job from Cristobal Huet about halfway through last season and never looked back until he hoisted the cup in June. Niemi is scheduled to meet with the Blackhawks for a salary arbitration meeting tomorrow which will likely give the 26-year-old goaltender a significant raise. Some are speculating that Niemi could be awarded as little as $2 million a season or as much as $4 million a season during the arbitration hearing tomorrow. Regardless, the arbitration award will continue to put Chicago further over the salary cap.

Chicago always has the option of walking away from the Niemi award, which would probably be a big mistake. Unfortunately, it’s a numbers game at this point as the Blackhawks try to dump the water overboard to help keep the ship from sinking. The problem is that the Blackhawks have two very hefty dead-weight contracts to contend with. The first belongs to Campbell with his $7 million cap hit. But Chicago backed themselves into a wall when they agreed to the no-trade clause in the contract. Sure, Campbell could waive his no-trade clause, but he will most likely do that only for a select group of teams – most of which would be reluctant to bring on his $7 million a season cap hit. Needless to say, Chicago is stuck with Campbell.

The second contract belongs to goaltender Cristobal Huet. The former Montreal Canadiens goaltender came over the same summer as Brian Campbell when Chicago offered him a $5.625 million per season contract. However, Huet found himself on the bench more often than not during his first season with the Blackhawks as veteran netminder Nikolai Khabibulin consistently  outplayed Huet. This past year the starting job was Huet’s to lose, which he managed to do  with ease to Niemi, who officially took over the starting job about halfway through the season. Now Chicago is pretty much stuck with an overpaid backup goaltender for another two seasons with no chance of a trade because no team wants to take on that type of salary for a career underachiever.

The Chicago Blackhawks have some very touch decisions to make, and with Niemi’s arbitration hearing coming up tomorrow, those decisions are quite imminent. Chicago will have a better idea of their predicament after the arbitration hearing with Niemi tomorrow. There is a very real possibility that Chicago will decide not to honor the arbitrator’s decision and instead opt to walk away from the contract. In that case, Niemi will likely sign with another team in the next day or two because young goaltenders with Stanley Cup rings are hot commodities right now. Rumors place San Jose and Philadelphia as the front-runners for Niemi should Chicago choose not to sign him. Don’t count out Tampa Bay or Dallas either.

What organizations all around the NHL right now are beginning to realize is that they can’t overpay for talent. It’s just part of the rules in a salary cap era. When you overpay for talent you risk getting yourself into a situation similar to that of the Chicago Blackhawks right now. But can you really blame players like Cristobal Huet or Brian Campbell for accepting big paydays? Heck no. If a general manager is willing to offer that type of contract, then why not take it and cash in while you can? Besides, the team got a championship ring out of the situation. That has to count for something, right?

We Should See Contract Limits Added to CBA

I am actually glad to see that the NHL stepped up and put the breaks on the 17-year, $102 million contract that New Jersey signed superstar forward Ilya Kovalchuk to. This was starting to get out of hand with the amount of long term-front loaded contracts we have seen signed since the 2005 CBA was created.

I first remember when goalie Rick DiPietro signed a 15-year, $67.5 million contract with New York in 2006. I thought this was a joke, because of several factors including A) Not many players last in the league for 15 years, B) What happens if DiPietro completely stinks in years 5-6 of the contract and the Islanders cannot trade him for a pizza? Looks like I have been right as in the last two seasons, DiPietro has been hampered by knee injuries and have played a grand total of 13 games with a 3-8 record. Contrary to popular belief, this was not a Mike Milbury signing as Milbury resigned as Islanders GM three months prior to the contract signing. But he’s not out of the water as he tried to sign DiPietro for 15 years in 2005 but the league discouraged it. Leave it up to owner Charles Wang to make the signing just after he hired Garth Snow as GM and Snow made moves to clear cap space to add more talent.

Other long-term/front loaded contracts that the league approved were when the Red Wings signed Henrik Zetterberg and Johan Franzen, but those didn’t raise as many eyebrows as when Chicago signed Marian Hossa to a 12-year deal.

According to Chris’ post that can be read here, a player’s “cap hit” is the average of the contract over the number of years. Sounds good and fair doesn’t it? Not really when you see the front loaded deals such as Kovi’s would been a $6 million cap hit in early years despite him making $11 million for said season.

A way the league can solve this developing issue is to create a “contract limit” that could be created to have a maximum number of years a team can sign a player to. This could be adjusted to a players age/number of seasons in the league.  You can have one set of regulations for players under 30 and one for 30 and over. The players age at the time he signs the contract will dictate which set of rules he will fall into.

For example, if you have a young player like Patrick Kane who will come off his current contract in 2015, he will be 26 years old. The U30 max contract could be 13 years, meaning that Chicago can keep Kane until he is 39. The Over-30 Max contract could be 10 years, putting players like Hossa under contract until he is 40 because he signed the Chicago deal last year when he was 30. If this was the rule for Ilya Kovalchuk, he would be under contract until he is 40. This would be a way to prevent contracts similar to the DiPietro signing. Also it would be a fair age for players who are in the twilight of their playing careers to either leave to win a Stanley Cup somewhere else or re-sign with their current team for less money when they are much older.

Most players, especially ones who have been in the league for anywhere between 17-20 years, retire between the ages of 38-40. Top players who retired in the last two seasons and their ages at retirement are Rob Blake (40), Rod Brind’Amour (39), Keith Tkachuk (38), Joe Sakic (40), and Jeremy Roenick (39).

Tags: , , ,

Chicago vs Philadelphia by the numbers

The Stanley Cup Finals are set to begin tonight with the number seven-seeded Philadelphia Flyers visiting the second-seeded Chicago Blackhawks in what should prove to be an immensely physical and entertaining series.

Both teams are incredible deep and offensively talented. Chicago’s strength comes from their roster depth, their speed and their mobility from the blue line forward. Philadelphia also has strong depth but plays a more physical, brash style of hockey that the Blackhawks will need to contend with and outplay if they intend to win the Cup. The story of this series could be those unlikely heroes who rise to the occasion and lead their team to victory – much like Maxim Talbot did for the Pittsburgh Penguins last year in Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Finals. While the numbers don’t always represent the whole truth, I wanted to see how each team matches up side by side, so I decided to research the stats of some of the key players on each side to see how they compare.

Mike Richards and Jonathan Toewsjonathan_toews

Richards:

  • 21 Points
  • 6 Goals
  • 15 Assists
  • +6

Toews:

  • 26 Points
  • 7 Goals
  • 19 Assists
  • +4

Chicago captain Jonathan Toews has beein linked to the Conn Smythe Trophy since as early as the second round with his intense performances every game. But for as good as Toews has been, Richards has been right there working hard to ensure victory for his own team. But as you can see, Toews outscores Richards in every offensive category, and Toews has played one less game overall than Richards as well. The question here is whether Toews can outplay Richards in this series or if the two will eventually cancel each other out.

Jeff Carter and Patrick Kanejeff-carter

Carter:

  • 5 Points
  • 4 Goals
  • 1 Assist
  • +1

Kane:

  • 20 Points
  • 7 Goals
  • 13 Assists
  • +2

While Kane significantly outscores Carter in every category, bear in mind that Carter has only played in six games to Kane’s 16. So in roughly a third of the games, Carter has only three less goals than Kane – including two in two games played against the Montreal Canadiens compared to zero goals posted by Kane in the last round against San Jose. It will be interesting to see how much of a factor Carter’s goal scoring capabilities become in this series – especially if Kane keeps dropping beach balls on the score sheet in the goals category.

Claude Giroux and Patrick Sharpsharp-patrick081120_584

Giroux:

  • 17 Points
  • 8 Goals
  • 9 Assists
  • +10

Sharp:

  • 16 Points
  • 7 Goals
  • 9 Assists
  • +3

Both of these players have had incredible postseasons, but are relatively unknown outside of their respective cities. Still, as their numbers show, they have been incredible assets to their respective clubs. Giroux slightly edges Sharp in most categories, but the glaring difference between the two is in their plus/minus stats. Seemingly, Giroux is a better all-around player with the ability to backcheck effectively and keep the puck out of his own net while scoring at the other end. Again, the numbers don’t tell the whole story, but if these two get matched up in the series, Giroux could prove to be a difference maker in the series.

Daniel Briere and Marian Hossabriere_daniel_getty_260

Briere:

  • 18 Points
  • 9 Goals
  • 9 Assists
  • +4

Hossa:

  • 11 Points
  • 2 Goals
  • 9 Assists
  • +8

The story here is Hossa’s two goals in 16 games, especially after the star forward posted nearly a goal every other game during the regular season. With the amount of talent surrounding him in Chicago, it’s hard to fathom why Hossa only put the puck in the net twice. But his plus-8 is a testament to his work ethic and his ability to back check. Still, Briere outscores Hossa in each of the offensive categories and only lacks in plus-minus. As Hossa makes a bid to get his name on the Stanley Cup for the third time in three years, it will be interesting to see if his lacking playoff performance is an indication to how this story will end. He very well could be the X-factor in this series.

Philadelphia’s Secondary Scoringdustin-byfuglien-blackhawks-reax-overtime-goal-playoffs--fc736468679be177_large

Gagne, Leino and Hartnell:

  • 30 Points
  • 14 Goals
  • 16 Assists
  • +10

Chicago’s Secondary Scoring

Byfuglien, Bolland and Versteeg:

  • 29 Points
  • 17 Goals
  • 12 Assists
  • +1

These are the depth players who could help make-or-break this series. Byfuglien was a hero for his performances against the San Jose Sharks in the Western Conference Finals, but both teams are very close in terms of offensive production. The interesting stat here is the plus/minus of each respective group. Granted, these players aren’t playing together night in and night out, but there is still heavy differential between the two groups of “secondary” scorers. Offense gets the glory but defense wins the game. Will that be the story of this years Stanley Cup Finals?

Michael Leighton and Antti NiemiPhiladelphia+Flyers+v+New+Jersey+Devils+rrh8g_CpCsVl

Leighton:

  • 1.45 Goals Against Average
  • .948 Save %
  • 3 Shutouts

Niemi:

  • 2.33 Goals Against Average
  • .921 Save %
  • 2 Shutouts

Is anyone else asking themselves where these guys came from? Because neither goalie was the starting goaltender for their respective club at the beginning of the season, yet both have had superb playoff runs and both are capable of leading their team to victory. In stat comparisons, Leighton wins by a landslide. His 1.45 goals against average is incredible, but Niemi has been more than capable in net for Chicago. This series very well could come down to a dual between Niemi and Leighton between the pipes.

Again, for the tenth time or so, the numbers don’t paint the entire picture. There are plenty of variables in this series that could turn the tides either way. Philadelphia plays a very rough, very physical blue-collar style of hockey. Chicago plays a very speedy game with a lot of mobility and puck-possession. But with two very deep squads who are capable of getting offense from all four of their effective lines, it might come down to who wants it more and who works the hardest to get it. With how similar these teams look on the stat sheet, I’m hoping for nothing less than an a thoroughly entertaining series.

Are We Getting Cosby-Ovechkin’d Out?

The NHL is finally releasing one of its’ worse kept secrets. As Chris reported in late-March that the next NHL Winter Classic will be between the Pittsburgh Penguins and Washington Capitals. The big question was where would it he held at. Potential sites pretty much came down to Heinz Field, FedEx Field, and Nationals Ballpark. I believe the NHL did a good job in going back to the football stadium because after going to Wrigley Field and Fenway Park the last two seasons, the prestige of going to a baseball stadium was getting played-out. In addition, the Fenway Park classic didn’t do so well in the ratings because it lacked (at the time) contending teams, and big names. That’s what you need to get the casual fan to watch the game amongst the buffet of college football bowl games on January 1. The Winter Classic isn’t for the die-hards like myself or the readers of HWB. The Winter Classic is for the casual “I only know about hockey when they show it on SportsCenter” type of fan. Big, sexy, marketable names and contending teams is what Bettman wants in the Winter Classic to get the viewership NBC wants and needs.

Speaking of NBC, I’d be willing to bet they had a hand in this as they only recognize eight teams: Chicago, Detroit, Pittsburgh, Washington, New York Rangers, Philadelphia, New Jersey and Boston.

Sidney and Alex will get the chance to duke it out at the Winter Classic in Pittsburgh.

Sidney and Alex will get the chance to duke it out at the Winter Classic in Pittsburgh.

I am kinda happy/kinda upset about this. We knew a Crosby-Ovechkin Winter Classic was on the horizon. This game has everything you need in a “one game showcase” of the NHL: recognizable names of Ovechkin, Crosby, Malkin, and Green. I’m actually more inclined to watch because I know Michigan State won’t be playing on New Year’s Day.  But how can the Penguins get to play in a second outdoor game before Original Six franchises New York and Toronto? Those fan bases, as well as perhaps the Canucks have legitimate beef of why they are being left out of the mix. It could perhaps be because those franchises don’t have marketable players (even Vancouver- Roberto Lulongo doesn’t count. You can’t see his face through a goalie mask) or because they simply aren’t good enough to contend on a year-to-year basis.

If you do want to put money on the Caps playing for the Stanley Cup next season, you should do so. Each season of the Winter Classic, the road participant has played for the Stanley Cup that season. Just ask the Penguins, Red Wings, and now Flyers. In addition, TSN is reporting there will be a second Winter Classic next season. Montreal will travel to Calgary in February to take on the Flames at McMahon Stadium.

 

Tags: , , , , ,

Nicklas Backstrom Signs Long Term Deal With Capitals

Nicklas Backstrom of the Washington CapitalsThe Washington Capitals and center Nicklas Backstrom have agreed to a long term contract that will keep Backstrom with the Capitals for the next 10 years. His deal is worth $67 million over that time, marking a cap hit of $6.7 million per season. This is certainly a well deserved raise for the 22 year old who posted 101 points as Alexander Ovechkin’s center, in only his third season in the NHL.

While the Capitals have to be happy to have two thirds of their top line locked up long term, management certainly has some work to do. There are still quite a few roster spots to fill before next season, with a limited amount of cap space to work with. Beyond that, the team clearly has adjustments to make on defense if they plan to make a run in the playoffs. Their limited offensive focus might have proven effective in the regular season, as the Capitals became the Presidents’ Trophy Winners, but it will not cut it during the playoffs.

The biggest question mark that remains is the future of Alexander Semin, who was mostly absent during their first round playoff exit. Semin, who posted a career high 40 goals and 84 points this season, has one year remaining on his contract, and could be used as trade bait to bring in a top-tier defenseman at next seasons trade deadline. The future of the Capitals looks to be centered around Ovechkin and Backstrom, with no room left over for Semin.

Tags: , ,

Playoff Ramblings

Here are some thoughts on the playoffs over the past couple weeks:

My post praising Miroslav Satan’s performance during the playoffs must have been the ultimate jinx. He carried a six game point streak when I wrote about how excellent he had been. In the four games that followed, and an epic collapse by the Bruins, Satan posted zero points, was a minus one, and only had nine shots on goal. Good news for the Bruins though, they’re still going to land either Taylor Hall or Tyler Seguin in the draft this summer.

Daniel Briere has been huge for the Flyers in the playoffs

Daniel Briere has been huge for the Flyers in the playoffs

The Philadelphia Flyers are the first ever seven seed to end up with home ice advantage in a playoff series. How did they pull this off? Well, I think its fair to say that they aren’t necessarily as bad as their seed and 88 point season may indicate. Remember this team has several young, but experienced, scorers. Mike Richards has been great, and Danny Briere has played his best playoff hockey picking up 17 points so far, with seven multi-point games. On top of that, the Flyers are picking up a lot of secondary scoring, especially in Claude Giroux who has six goals and seven assists in 13 playoff games. Ville Leino, a late season acquisition, has even made his presence felt with nine points in as many games. You certainly can’t forget about the defensive prowess this team has, lead by perennial all star Chris Pronger. He’s more than capable of shutting down the oppositions top scorers.

So perhaps the Philadelphia Flyers are finally molding into the team that many thought they were going to be. Maybe the leadership issues and problems in the locker room are a thing of the past. They have all the confidence and momentum in the world right now, and will be a tough team to handle.

The Chicago Blackhawks are outstanding. Young captain, Jonathan Toews has been very impressive so far with 21 post-season points. Goaltending has not been the huge issue everyone thought it would be. Antti Niemi has been solid, and has out-dueled two very good goaltenders in Pekka Rinne and Roberto Luongo.

Things seem to be clicking on all cylinders for the Blackhawks, minus the presence of two players. Marian Hossa had a very good first round against Nashville, posting six points in the series. But since them, he’s been very quiet, much like last year, with only three points in the seven games played since finishing off the Predators. Along with Hossa, Kris Versteeg has been less productive than I expected so far. His six points and minus two rating seem low for a young player with the talent level he has. Remember, Versteeg posted terrific numbers as a rookie last season, but is perhaps seeing a decrease in ice time with the top line being so effective.

The San Jose Sharks are still very much competitive in the west. It seemed like everyone wrote them off after being crushed by the Red Wings in game four of that series. Did everyone just forget that they still had a 3-1 series lead? Even if they were still the Sharks who choke in the playoffs, they could have surely taken one game and prevented the Wings from going on. But instead, they bounced back like a true contender and eliminated Detroit in five.

Montreal is having one of the most impressive playoff campaigns in recent years that I can remember. First, they squandered the top seeded Washington Capitals in seven games. This is a team that featured several of the world’s top players: Ovechkin, Backstrom, Semin, and Green. Then, they followed that performance with a seven game dismantling of the defending Stanley Cup champions. Surely a team that can take out two of the top NHL clubs is capable of making it to the finals, right?

Finally, here’s to hoping for an original six match-up in the finals.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Questionable Goalie Inteference

Tomas Holmstrom is out of the crease, but is questionable for goalie interference.

Tomas Holmstrom is out of the crease, but is questionable for goalie interference.

Playoff hockey is here, fans either jubilated or angry as hopes and dreams of their favorite team winning the Stanley Cup were extinguished like a dying flame or still flickering brightly. One thing that is constant though is the hatred of the referring. Be it the belief of a botched call to a giant conspiracy theory, the referees are under great scrutiny for their jobs in this post season, like many other post seasons.

I too fall within the category of questioning some calls, especially goalie interference.

Being a fan of the Detroit Red Wings, I am no stranger to seeing many goals taken away by prominent figures such as Tomas Holmstrom pitching a tent in front of the net keeper. What aggravates me is not that the referees are making the calls, as they are making the appropriate call, but that the rule needs to be re-addressed for contact outside the goal crease.

Rule number 69 – Interference on the Goalkeeper gives light to the current dilemma. Rather lengthy, I will paraphrase:

69.1 Interference on the Goalkeeper: Goals should be disallowed only if: (1) an attacking player, either by his positioning or by contact, impairs the goalkeeper’s ability to move freely within his crease or defend his goal…Incidental contact with a goalkeeper will be permitted, and resulting goals allowed, when such contact is initiated outside of the goal crease, provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact.

69.4 Contact outside the Goal Crease: If an attacking player initiates any contact with a goalkeeper, other than incidental contact, while the goalkeeper is outside his goal crease, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed.

The gray area that comes from the rule is what really is “incidental contact” and “reasonable effort to avoid such contact”. Far too often a player is in front of the crease moving  side to side to screen the goalie, the shot is fired and the goalie comes out to stop it and the two make contact. More times than not, the goal is disallowed, yet the majority of times the player did not even know the goalie was there because of his range of view. So, who has the right to the ice? The player trying to screen or the goalie moving out into the player? And more importantly, how can a player avoid such calls?

Right now the goalie has the right to the open ice as he has the right to move freely to defend his goal. As for the player to avoid the play altogether, he has to be completely aware of the goalie even in times where the goalie edges out of the net at the last second, otherwise be subject to interference. This however is frustrating as a fan and as a player, as it does not resolve the problem.

Perhaps make the crease larger giving the goalie more room to defend his goal, or allow the play to play out without a call when incidental contact is made between a goalie and a player fighting for the same ice. Either option would resolve the problem, but the question still remains if the league feels it is a problem. From a fans perspective, it would be nice to see that this be discussed in the off-season.

Do you feel goalie interference should be tweaked? Why or why not? If so, what would your resolution be? Feel free to comment or email me at EB@hockeyworldblog.com to spark some discussion.

Tags: , ,

Sharks look to oust Red Wings as Round 2 opens in San Jose

After disposing of the Colorado Avalanche in 6 games in the opening round of the 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs, the San Jose Sharks know they have a tough test ahead of themselves when they meet the Detroit Red Wings in the opening game of their second-round series tonight.

“They have tremendous puck possession and they don’t seem to get too rattled ever,” said Sharks defenseman Rob Blake.

San Jose has a history of being “choke artists” in the playoffs. Last year the Sharks came into the playoffs as the top seeded team in the West, much like they did this year, only to lose in the first round to a very tough Anaheim Ducks opponent. While the Sharks were able to breath a sigh of relief after getting out of the first round, they may have a much bigger hurdle to jump in the Red Wings if they intend to make their way to the Stanley Cup Finals. Detroit has an arsenal of tools at their disposal, but their experience in the postseason may be their best asset against San Jose, and the Sharks know they can’t take Detroit too lightly.

“(Detroit is) a veteran squad that has been there before,” said Manny Maholtra. “They have experience and that always counts for something.”

Does San Jose Have What it Takes?

As one of the best line combinations during the regular season, Joe Thornton, Patrick Marleau and Dany Heatley were notably absent in most games of the opening series against Colorado. The trio of superstars only managed ten points combined in the first round – and only one of those points was a goal. This is the story of the Sharks in recent years. One of the best teams in the regular season fails to elevate their game to the next level needed for a long playoff run. Pavelski, Setoguchi and Clowe were able to take the reigns and lead San Jose to victory in the first round, but how long will that trend last? Especially against Detroit’s deep defense? San Jose is offensively deep and talented in their own right with similar players on defense who are more than capable of chipping in offensively, but Detroit could have their way with San Jose if the Sharks’ top players fail to appear again.

Does Detroit Have What it Takes?

Phoenix took Detroit to seven games in a hard-hitting, physical series. Not to mention the travel that Detroit had to endure as part of the series. At times the Red Wings looked old and rusted, while at other times the team looked incredibly hungry for another shot at the Cup. Game seven was one of the best performances by the Red Wings in recent memory. They were quick to get on Phoenix players on the boards, they got in shooting lanes and Jimmy Howard stood on his head as a bonafide NHL superstar. So which Detroit Red Wings team made the trip to San Jose? Game seven Red Wings who looked poised for a long playoff run or Game 6 Red Wings who needed wheelchairs to get them around on the ice? Jimmy Howard needs to be the better netminder in this series, which is a daunting task when his opponent is none other than Evgeni Nabokov – a player that only had 44 wins and a 2.43 goals against average in the regular season. Detroit needs to be strong on their special teams as well. Their penalty kill was up and down during the Phoenix series and their power play proved to be a difference maker in the end. Detroit’s best players like Pavel Datsyuk and Henrik Zetterberg need to be their best at both ends of the ice of Detroit wants to advance to the Conference Finals.